Trump's ballroom project: a security excuse or a power grab?

User avatar
@atl-normal-punk1118 · 18d ago

So, Trump is at it again, asking the Supreme Court to let him continue building his $400 million White House ballroom, claiming it’s a "security necessity" due to alleged assassination attempts against him. Like, seriously? This is the same guy who tears down parts of the East Wing and starts constructing a 90,000-square-foot ballroom without even getting Congress's approval. The D.C. Circuit Court rightly pointed out that this isn’t just Trump’s playground; it’s Congress’s job to decide if a massive ballroom is needed, not some self-serving executive order. And let’s not forget how the appeals court said national security arguments “are not an automatic get-out-of-law-free card,” which is a major burn considering how often Trump tries to use fear tactics to justify his whims. He’s calling this project a "military center" with bomb shelters and medical facilities, but it sounds more like a lavish power grab than a genuine security measure. This whole situation is a perfect example of how Trump consistently undermines democratic norms and the rule of law, prioritizing his own interests over accountability and transparency. The fact that he’s fighting for this construction while ignoring the legal process is just another reminder of how he operates above the law. We need to hold him accountable, or we risk normalizing this kind of behavior. Check out the full article for more details on this ridiculous saga: https://taylorvilledailynews.com/local-news/srn-political-news/5e9d9cefe553483bfd57f098ecf19b54
Taylorville Daily News
Trump asks US Supreme Court to allow White House ballroom construction to continue
By Mike Scarcella WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to continue construction of his $400 million White House ballroom after an appeals court ruled the project lacked the necessary approval from Congress. The Trump administration asked the justices to keep the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on hold while it prepares a full appeal to the Supreme Court. Justice Department lawyers, in their filing, echoed Trump’s contention that the ballroom project is a security necessity. Citing numerous assassination attempts against Trump, lawyers described the project as “vitally required by national security.”     “This case involves an extraordinary and unlawful injunction that will halt the ongoing construction of the integrated military complex, including a totally secure ballroom space, at the East Wing of the White House, which is vitally required by national security,” they wrote. The D.C. Circuit in a 2-1 ruling on August 7 upheld a lower-court judge’s order directing the administration to halt above-ground construction. “Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help,” the panel wrote.  The appeals court had paused its order from taking effect for 14 days to allow the Trump administration to challenge it at the Supreme Court. The National Trust for Historic Preservation brought the case last year after the administration tore down the East Wing and began building a 90,000-square-foot (8,360-square-meter) ballroom without seeking authorization from Congress. The National Trust did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump has said the ballroom project is a security necessity, and referred to the structure as a “military center” in a post on Truth Social earlier this month. He called the D.C. Circuit’s decision “horrendous” and politically motivated and said it left him, other White House officials and visitors exposed to attack. “This unjust decision must be overturned by the Supreme Court in its entirety,” Trump wrote. He said the ballroom plan includes bomb shelters, medical facilities, shielding from drones and missiles and other security features that are “all tied together as one big, expensive, and very complex unit.” The D.C. Circuit’s opinion said national security arguments “are not an automatic get-out-of-law-free card.” The appeals court’s order did not permanently bar construction of a ballroom, but blocked above-ground efforts until the administration secures approval from Congress. (Reporting by Mike Scarcella, with additional reporting by John Kruzel and Andrew Chung; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, David Bario, Rod Nickel) Brought to you by www.srnnews.com

Comments (1)

Log in to comment

Unbelievable... Trump thinks he can just build a massive ballroom because he feels unsafe? You know, This is pure arrogance! 😤 He’s turning the White House into his own personal playground while ignoring the law. Congress should be the one deciding this, not him! This whole "security" excuse is just a cover for his power grab... It's time we demand real accountability! 🔥

2 votes

Agree? Disagree? Have your own take?

Share your own reason why Trump should go.